Landmark judgment on discharge of accused and framing of …
Dec 13, 2015 · On consideration of the authorities about the. scope of Section 227 and 228 of the Code, the. following principles emerge: (i) The Judge while considering the question of. framing the charges Under Section 227 of the. Code of Criminal Procedure has the undoubted. power to sift and weigh the evidence for the limited.
Law Web: Supreme court Judgment on essential ingredients of …
Dec 26, 2021 · CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2010. 13th December 2021. Author: Surya Kant, J. Citation: 2021 ALL SCR (ONLINE) 761 Appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 18th June, 2009 passed by Andhra Pradesh High Court, dismissing his criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 28th March, 2002 of the Special Judge, CBI Cases, Hyderabad whereby he was held guilty of the offences under Sections ...
Landmark Supreme Court Judgment on cause of action and
Oct 16, 2014 · A cause of action is a bundle of facts which are. required to be proved for obtaining relief and for the. said purpose, the material facts are required to be. stated but not the evidence except in certain cases. where the pleadings relied on are in regard to. misrepresentation, fraud, wilful default, undue influence.
Landmark Supreme Court Judgment on framing of issues - Law …
Jan 3, 2001 · Landmark Supreme Court Judgment on framing of issues. The stage of framing the issues is an important one inasmuch as on that day the scope of the trial is determined by laying the path on which the trial shall proceed excluding diversions and departures therefrom. The date fixed for settlement of issues is, therefore, a date fixed for hearing.
Supreme Court: Basic principles for conduct of disciplinary enquiry
Jul 6, 2020 · (5) Where the enquiry is not governed by any rules/regulations/statutory provisions and the only obligation is to observe the principles of natural justice -- or, for that matter, wherever such principles are held to be implied by the very nature and impact of the order/action -- the Court or the Tribunal should make a distinction between a …
Law Web
4 days ago · So far as ground being communicated through the. remand application is concerned, the law in this regard is now. well settled. The Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Prabir. Purkayastha V/s State (NCT of Delhi) 2024 SCC OnLine SC 934 has elaborately considered this issue and in para 49 of the said decision, the distinction between the “reasons of arrest” and “grounds of arrest” have been ...
Supreme Court Guidelines On Grant Of Bail To Accused Not …
Oct 7, 2021 · Win your case! LawWeb.in: Expert legal help, exam prep, & top court judgments. Trusted by judges, lawyers, & students.
Supreme court guidelines for deciding application for rejection of ...
Feb 13, 2022 · This has been reiterated recently by the Supreme Court in Srihari Hanumandas Totala v.Hemant Vithal Kamat (2021 SCC OnLine SC 565) It was reiterated as below:. Order 7 Rule 11(d) of CPC provides that the plaint shall be rejected “where the suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by any law”.
Supreme Court: after 2018 amendment in the Specific Relief
Oct 1, 2018 · The relief of specific performance of an agreement, was at all. material times, equitable, discretionary relief, governed by the. provisions of the Specific Relief Act 1963, hereinafter referred to as S.R.A. Even though the power of the Court to direct specific
Landmark judgments of Supreme court on electronic evidence …
Apr 3, 2018 · Landmark Supreme Court Judgment : Certificate required under Section 65B (4) is a condition precedent to the admissibility of Electronic evidence. The reference is thus answered by stating that: (a) Anvar P.V. (supra), as clarified by us hereinabove, is the law. declared by this Court on Section 65B of the Evidence Act.