A meta-analysis found that peer reviews in radiation oncology led to recommendations to change treatment plans in more than ...
The Beckman Foundation wanted to make sure it wasn’t unfairly prioritizing elite research institutions. So it tried something ...
A trove of data is providing insights into the main reasons studies are pulled from the arXiv preprint platform.
Agency will propose new regulatory actions to reduce health risks associated with the compound's industrial uses ...
SailPoint Technologies, Inc., a leader in unified identity security for enterprises, was named a Customers’ Choice in the ...
A new AI-driven tool to "automate a number of editorial quality checks" has been developed by Springer Nature to alert ...
MemorialCare's Long Beach Medical Center and Miller Children's & Women's Hospital had 83 physicians named Super Doctors and five as Rising Stars by the 2025 Southern California Super Doctors & Rising ...
Reducing your feedback and putting the onus on students to generate solutions sends a clear signal that learning is ...
The NHS will never work properly unless the government acts on social care, writes Richard Humphries After six months in power, the UK government has finally set out how it intends to tackle the ...
For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us using the feedback ...
Study finds involving radiologists in radiation therapy planning leads to higher rates of major changes, emphasizing the importance of collaboration ...
The linear model of production and consumption has not only led to extreme and irreversible environmental damage but has also ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback