From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech ... paid for by those who can afford it. North Dakota’s abortion ban will not be enforced while the state appeals an earlier decision ...

A group of North Dakota lawmakers heard emotional testimony on a handful of bills related to reproductive health care and the insurance — or lack thereof — to cover it.

Those who are pro-abortion can celebrate a victory today as the North Dakota Supreme Court denied the State’s effort to reinstate a near-total ban on the act, which was struck down in District Court in September.

North Dakota's highest court has ruled that the state's overturned abortion ban will not be enforced during an appeal of a judge's ruling that struck down the law in September.

North Dakota lawmakers want to ban red flag laws, a tool that advocates of extreme risk protection orders say could help prevent tragedies.

BISMARCK, N.D. (North Dakota Monitor) – A pediatric endocrinologist said one of his patients attempted suicide after learning North Dakota had criminalized gender-affirming care for minors.

Casas was the last of a dozen witnesses to testify for the plaintiffs in a trial to decide the ban’s fate. The court will hear testimony from the state’s witnesses starting Friday.

The state intends to bring medical professionals to the stand to argue that providing treatment to minors brings uncertain results to the patient.

South Central District Court Judge Jackson Lofgren heard testimony over the past four days from doctors explaining transgender health and gender dysphoria.

Abby Berger of Bismarck stands Jan. 29, 2025, before a legislative committee hearing with a photo illustrating the large number of syringes and vials needed to help her conceive her child. (Jeff Beach/North Dakota Monitor)BISMARCK,

A trial over North Dakota's ban on gender-affirming medical care for kids is happening in Bismarck. The trial began Monday and is set to last eight days.

The North Dakota Supreme Court on Friday declined to reinstate a near-total abortion ban as the state’s appeal proceeds. In a Friday majority opinion by Justice Daniel Crothers, the court appeared skeptical of several of the state’s core arguments defending the law,